Murphy Cassone vs Thai Kwiatkowski Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 Jul at 02:41 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Cassone vs T. Kwiatkowski

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Cassone 1 - 0 Kwiatkowski
They have played 2 sets in total, with Murphy Cassone winning 2 and Thai Kwiatkowski winning 0. The last match between Murphy Cassone and Thai Kwiatkowski was at the Citi Open - Washington, 19-07-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Murphy Cassone getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cassone | 1 |
| Kwiatkowski | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Citi Open - Washington(07-19-25)
M. Cassone vs T. Kwiatkowski H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $74,970 | Career Prize Money | $94,010 |
| 58.48% (100-71) | Career Total W/L | 56.28% (233-181) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 8 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Cassone vs T. Kwiatkowski Match Preview:
- Kwiatkowski's second serve performance has been poor, winning 0% of points in recent months. In contrast, Cassone has a solid 47.29% win rate on their second serve.
- Question: Which player has the advantage in return games? Cassone shows a significant edge by winning 44.68% of points on opponent's second serve compared to Kwiatkowski's 0%.
- First serve return statistics favor Cassone with a 25.16% success rate, whereas Kwiatkowski is again at 0%.
- Under pressure, Cassone displays resilience, saving 57.74% of breakpoints, whereas Kwiatkowski has not saved any.
- Overall match performance over the last year shows Cassone winning 64.56% of matches, compared to Kwiatkowski's 25%.
- Kwiatkowski's best performances come on hard courts with a 61% win rate, while Cassone excels on indoor hard courts with a 71% success rate.
- Player level discrepancies exist, as Kwiatkowski primarily competes on the Main tour, while Cassone excels in Challengers/ITF tournaments.
- The average rank of opponents is higher for Cassone (345.32) than Kwiatkowski (523.75), indicating tougher competition for Cassone.
- In deciding sets, Cassone boasts a 58% win rate over the past year, slightly better than Kwiatkowski’s 50%.
- Recent breakpoint conversions highlight Kwiatkowski's struggles at 0%, whereas Cassone has a respectable rate of 31.1%.
Editorial Prediction (July 19, 2025, UTC):
The statistical comparison between Kwiatkowski and Cassone demonstrates clear advantages for Cassone across several key performance areas.
Cassone's proficiency in both serve and return games, combined with a higher breakpoint conversion rate, positions them as the stronger contender in this matchup.
Analyzing Kwiatkowski’s lack of success under pressure and lower match win percentage over the past year only amplifies Cassone's favored status.
Given these factors, Cassone is the predicted winner for the upcoming tennis match.
Murphy Cassone vs Thai Kwiatkowski Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Cassone vs T. Kwiatkowski H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:15:48 | Average Match Time | 1:15:48 |
| 79% (34/43) | 1st Serve % | 67% (52/78) |
| 91% (31/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (32/52) |
| 67% (6/9) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (10/26) |
| 20% (3/15) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 46% (36/78) | Return Points Win % | 14% (6/43) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Cassone Recent Matches Played
T. Kwiatkowski Recent Matches Played

M. Cassone vs T. Kwiatkowski Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.48% (100/71) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.28% (233/181) |
| 56.89% (227/172) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.08% (544/426) |
| 52.63% (2012/1811) | Games Win/Loss | 52.59% (4871/4392) |
| 56.00% (56/44) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.08% (152/101) |
| 28.57% (2/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.02% (47/40) |
| 66.67% (36/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.75% (34/33) |
| 60.00% (6/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/7) |
| 0.47 | Aces Per Game | 0.47 |
| 868 | Aces Total | 2117 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 480 | Total Double Faults | 1237 |
| 1:30:54 | Average Match Time | 1:27:18 |
| 350.98 | Average Opponent Rank | 520.55 |
| 64% (6938/10906) | 1st Serve % | 60% (15246/25604) |
| 71% (4947/6938) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (10949/15246) |
| 51% (2013/3967) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5130/10358) |
| 41% (411/1005) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1080/2606) |
| 38% (4195/10909) | Return Points Win % | 39% (10391/26391) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Slam W/L | 14.29% (2/12) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Main Tour W/L | 35.71% (10/18) |
| 58.00% (58/42) | Challenger W/L | 53.21% (116/102) |
| 63.79% (37/21) | Futures W/L | 69.80% (104/45) |
| 59% (98/167) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (230/408) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 53% (33/62) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (71/142) |
| 53% (30/57) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (62/140) |
| 86% (100/86) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (252/199) |
| 13% (100/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (252/52) |
| 18% (71/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (162/33) |